20:"$Sreact.view_transition" 21:I[9754,["/_next/static/chunks/2t36f5p4pjzlb.js","/_next/static/chunks/1gyqeidjm5eoa.js","/_next/static/chunks/0_fjnxc4tt_l_.js","/_next/static/chunks/1ymt1shyhmu-4.js","/_next/static/chunks/3kv2zf0i7s2wc.js","/_next/static/chunks/1vs_3g_g75zmk.js","/_next/static/chunks/2g4dh802s8oz3.js","/_next/static/chunks/1bc3f0shukf1j.js","/_next/static/chunks/192kgs9v_t14j.js","/_next/static/chunks/0z6pw0v5c_lx5.js","/_next/static/chunks/08r60e6icmtkc.js","/_next/static/chunks/3trx6c0i7_x-3.js","/_next/static/chunks/40sro5bzp9bi_.js","/_next/static/chunks/1wgf3tk38y6cf.js"],"ProjectDetail"] 22:T6bb7, AI WhatChelin — AI 工具选择困难症的解药

AI WhatChelin·tykimos 46+ 工具每日自动更新

AI 工具推荐 · 对比 · 归路决策

先别挑工具，
先回答“我是谁”。

AI 工具选择困难症的解药。把“我是谁”分叉成归属：先按身份归路，再在路里按流行度排出一列车道——选择从此是一次显式的归路决策。

我是谁 → 归路

编程

Vibe Coder 车道 · 编码 Agent 与 AI IDE

创作

创作者车道 · 快速收缩选项

办公

通用办公车道 · 低频决策

编程

Vibe Coder 车道

创作

创作者车道

办公

通用办公车道

01 — BRANCH

三条分叉，三种人群。

工具选择先做一次身份→类别的映射。你站在哪条路上，决定了这一列车道会为你排进哪些工具。

FORK A · 编程

Vibe Coder

想比较 AI 编程工具、追踪编码工具的流行趋势、在 CLI 框架与 AI IDE 之间做出归路的开发者。

map 想要比较 AI 编程工具的用户
map 关注工具流行趋势的开发者
map 编码 Agent 与 AI IDE 的分叉

FORK B · 创作

创作者

需要快速决策、在密集发布周期里选出够用工具、按信号收缩选项的创作者与内容团队。

map 需要快速决策的创作者
map 在创作与设计工具间选择
map 用流行度收缩候选名单

FORK C · 办公

通用办公

在写作、表格与自动化之间权衡、希望一次看清单一结论而非逐家试错的办公人群。

map 自动化工作流程的选择
map 办公文本与表格工具对比
map 低频选择、高频使用的范式

02 — LANES

车道里，按流行度排队。

每条分叉内是一列横向工具车道，队列按流行度排序。最亮的那格是被pick的推荐项，其余依据信号逐级排下。评分为相对刻度，示例信号值仅供参考。

编程

Vibe Coder 车道

排名 1–3

1ChatGPTAI 对话与编程助手97

2Claude CodeCLI 编码 Agent92

3CursorAI IDE90

相对刻度：只表达队列内的先后与差距，不构成绝对权威。

创作

创作者车道

排名 1–3

Midjourney图像生成97

Canva设计与排版91

Runway视频创作86

办公

通用办公车道

排名 1–3

Microsoft Copilot文档与办公套件95

Notion AI笔记与协作88

Zapier工作流自动化82

示例榜单用于示意队列形态；具体名额与评分以每日刷新为准。

03 — PRICING

定价，也放进同一根轴。

横穿过三条分叉，给出一个与流行度拼贴着看的维度：把价格刻度拉出来做第二重校验，帮助你判断“热门”是否真的“值”。

ChatGPT

Midjourney

Cursor

Copilot

Zapier

免费 / 低订阅档位更高投入

柱高为示意性的定价刻度，仅表达相对位置：把各个分叉的工放在同一根轴上横向横穿，获得一个比“谁更热门”多一维的取舍依据。

定价经常变动，此处只表相对刻度，不承诺任何具体价格。

当一条分叉里出现“热门指数高、定价刻度也高”的工具，你需要在目标与预算之间做显式取舍——这正是归路决策愿意替你提前算好的那一层。

逐项核对每个分叉的价格刻度，比只看单一分值更接近实况，也更接近一次自重。

04 — SENTIMENT

社区怎么说？反应偏向一线。

赞成与质疑各占一段，绘出一根反应偏向线：同一工具的社区声量，拆成“力挺”与“存疑”两端，供你判断热度是否带情绪水分。

SENTIMENT LEAN — 赞成 ↪ 质疑

ChatGPT

力挺 86%

Cursor

力挺 74%

Claude Code

力挺 66%

Copilot

质疑 52%

Runway

质疑 60%

把赞成与质疑并列拉开，你会发现“热门”并不总等于“一致好评”。反应偏斜会随每日重排一起更新。

社区信号，非官方数据。

05 — CADENCE

每天凌晨，分叉重新排一次。

这份指南不是一次成型：它每天自动重扫 32 个 AI 工具、14 个官方网站、社区讨论与定价页面，把分叉与车道刷新一遍——你的归路决策永远站在最新一天之上。

无论你是刚想比较 AI 编程工具的 Vibe Coder、需要快速收缩选项的创作者，还是想在办公工具之间做低频决策的工作人员，每日一次的重排让“昨天还流行的”不至于成为误导你的过时结论。

覆盖 46+ 款编程、创作与办公工具。每次刷新都重新回答同一件事：今天，谁还应当排在你的车道前面？

DAILY UPDATE TICK

工具覆盖46+

官方站点检索14

更新时段每日 05:00 KST

数据源官方 + 社区

评分基于社区信号，并非官方数据。
信息更新频繁，个别条目存在过时风险。
README 部分内容被截断，上榜名额与细则以源文档为准。

23:T6b54, AI WhatChelin — Choosing the right AI tool, sorted by how you build

AI WhatChelin·tykimos 46+ tools auto-updated daily

AI tool guide · compare · decide by fork

Before you pick a tool,
first ask who you are.

The cure for AI tool choice paralysis. This fork maps “who you are” into a route: you split by identity first, then each lane lines the tools up by popularity — so choosing becomes an explicit decision you can retrace.

who you are → the route

Coding

Vibe Coder lane · coding agents & AI IDEs

Creation

Creator lane · narrowing options fast

Office

General office lane · low-frequency decisions

Coding

Vibe Coder lane

Creation

Creator lane

Office

General office lane

01 — BRANCH

Three forks, three audiences.

A tool choice starts with one identity-to-category mapping. Which road you stand on decides which lane of tools will be queued for you.

FORK A · Coding

Vibe Coder

Developers weighing AI coding tools, tracking coding-tool trends, and deciding between CLI agent frameworks and AI IDEs.

map Choosing between AI coding tools
map Tracking tool popularity trends
map CLI agents vs AI IDEs

FORK B · Creation

Creators

Creators and content teams who need fast decisions, pick tools on dense release cycles, and shrink options by signal.

map Creators who need quick decisions
map Choosing between design & creation tools
map Narrowing the list by popularity

FORK C · Office

General office

People balancing writing, spreadsheets, and automation — who want one clear verdict instead of trialing tools one by one.

map Choosing tooling for automation work
map Comparing office text & sheet tools
map Low-frequency choice, high-frequency use

02 — LANES

Inside each lane, tools queue by popularity.

Each fork opens into a horizontal lane of tools, ordered by popularity. The brightest cell is the recommended pick; the rest fall in line by signal. Scores are a relative scale — illustrative signal values only.

Coding

Vibe Coder lane

rank 1–3

1ChatGPTChat & coding assistant97

2Claude CodeCLI coding agent92

3CursorAI IDE90

Relative scale: shows order and gaps inside the queue, not absolute authority.

Creation

Creator lane

rank 1–3

MidjourneyImage generation97

CanvaDesign & layout91

RunwayVideo creation86

Office

General office lane

rank 1–3

Microsoft CopilotDocs & office suite95

Notion AINotes & collaboration88

ZapierWorkflow automation82

Illustrative leaderboard showing the lane shape; actual slots and scores follow the daily refresh.

03 — PRICING

Pricing, on the same axis.

Cutting across all three forks, this is a second dimension to weigh alongside popularity: pull the price scale out and judge whether “popular” also means “worth it”.

ChatGPT

Midjourney

Cursor

Copilot

Zapier

free / lowtiershigher cost

Bar height is an illustrative price scale showing relative positions only: putting tools from every fork on one shared axis gives you a tradeoff signal that runs deeper than “who is more popular”.

Pricing changes often; this expresses relative position, not a quoted price.

When a lane shows a tool that ranks high on popularity and high on this price scale, you now have an explicit target-vs-budget tradeoff — the kind of decision a fork is designed to surface before you commit.

Checking the price tick across each fork beats reading a single score, and reads closer to a real weighing.

04 — SENTIMENT

What does the community say? One leaning line.

For and against each take a stretch of the line — the same tool’s community voice splits into “backing” and “skeptical” so you can tell whether the heat is real.

SENTIMENT LEAN — for ↪ against

ChatGPT

86% for

Cursor

74% for

Claude Code

66% for

Copilot

52% against

Runway

60% against

Lay for and against side by side and “popular” rarely equals “universally loved”. The lean shifts with each daily refresh.

Community signal, not official data.

05 — CADENCE

Every morning, the forks re-sort.

This guide is not built once: each day it re-scans 32 AI tools, 14 official sites, community discussions, and pricing pages, then refreshes forks and lanes — so your decision always sits on the newest day there is.

Whether you are a Vibe Coder comparing AI coding tools, a creator shrinking the list fast, or an office worker making a low-frequency call, the daily re-sort keeps “what was popular yesterday” from quietly misleading you.

Coverage spans 46+ coding, creation, and office tools. Every refresh re-answers the same question: today, who still deserves the front of your lane?

DAILY UPDATE TICK

Tools covered46+

Official sites scanned14

Refresh time05:00 KST

Sourcesofficial + community

Scores reflect community signals, not official data.
Frequent updates mean some items may go stale.
Part of the README was truncated; slots and details follow the source.

a:[["$","$20",null,{"enter":{"secondary-forward":"secondary-forward","secondary-back":"secondary-back-enter","default":"none"},"exit":{"secondary-forward":"secondary-forward","secondary-back":"secondary-back-exit","default":"none"},"update":{"secondary-forward":"secondary-forward","secondary-back":"secondary-back-update","default":"none"},"default":"none","children":["$","$L21","cmt2zh3gu01sy6271jutyg3gy:zh-CN:beautified",{"project":{"id":"cmt2zh3gu01sy6271jutyg3gy","slug":"tykimos-ai-whatchelin","name":"ai-whatchelin","description":"AI 工具推荐与对比指南，每日自动更新","authorName":"tykimos","authorVerification":{"verified":false,"verifiedAt":null},"category":"development_tools","subcategory":"data_ai_tools","experienceUrl":null,"qualityScore":51,"featured":false,"officialSite":null,"views":{"original":{"available":true},"official":{"available":false,"reason":"disabled_by_policy"},"beautified":{"available":true,"reason":null},"defaultView":"beautified"},"beautifiedView":{"revisionId":"cmt2zh3hq01ta6271sogymcru","kind":"artifact","artifact":{"schemaVersion":"localized-static-html-v4","kind":"static_html","locales":["zh-CN","en"],"defaultLocale":"zh-CN","documents":{"zh-CN":"$22","en":"$23"},"designDirections":{"schemaVersion":"dodot-design-directions-v1","directions":[{"id":"decision-fork-map","name":"Decision Fork Map — 路径分叉归类器","projectMetaphor":"一条把『我是谁』分叉成工具归属的路线图：先按身份（Vibe Coder / 创作者 / 办公）分叉，再在每个分叉里按流行度权重排出一列车道。工具选择不再是一个口号，而是一次显式的归路决策。","signatureVisual":"一个倒置的分叉树（粗主干向下分裂为三条斜向支路，每条支路再稀释成一列横向工具车道）；走向车道的枝段按流行度值增亮，被选中推荐的工具枝端醒目标识为亮色终点。这是分类结构，不是营销配图。","heroGeometry":"纵向——左侧一条粗主干，向右下方分裂出三条斜支路，每条支路末端接一条横向工具道（3 条水平车道）；车道与车道之间留白以形成分支节奏，选中车道用实底强调。","sectionSequence":["hero_fork_intro（我是谁决定选谁：先别挑，先归路）","branch_audiences（三条分叉=三种人群，身份→类别的映射）","weighted_lanes（每条分叉内的车道：按流行度排序的工具队列）","pricing_radar（横穿分叉的定价雷达，作为另一维校验）","sentiment_axis（社区反应对比线：赞成/质疑的偏向）","daily_cadence（每日自动重排：分叉与车道每天刷新一次）"],"surfaceModel":"纸张式分区：背景为暖中性纸色，章节以清晰的分类卡片而非圆角浮层堆叠；支路与车道作为贯穿版面的平面连接结构，选区使用低对比毛玻璃质感，依赖结构而非阴影分层。","palette":"以纸白为底、墨色文字打底；三条分叉分别以三种识别色（编程青 / 创作杏橙 / 办公绛红）标记，选中车道用高饱和强调色；次层用中性灰阶表达流行度刻度。","typography":"标题用较宽字重的无衬线并配合粗斜的主干隐喻（可用字重与缩进制造分叉感）；正文使用克制的中性无衬线，数字与评分使用等宽字体表刻度。","desktopComposition":"桌面为纵向分叉树叙事：左侧主干区固定身份入口，向右上/右上收拢出三列并排的车道，车道上方悬定价雷达轴，底部以一条连续结构线收回到每日重排说明。横贯对比在全宽内完成。","mobileTransformation":"桌面三列车道在 390px 折叠为单一横向滑动游标（一次只能聚焦一个分叉），分支以竖向折线表现而非横向散开；定价雷达降级为可横向滑动的刻度条。同一概念，不同排布的决策，而非单纯竖排。","mediaStrategy":"无合格本地素材（assetManifest 为空），因此不设媒体区、不伪造产品截图；标志视觉完全由分叉数据结构和文本驱动的排版承担。","forbiddenPatterns":["不出现大口号+三张指标卡的开场","不出现功能卡片墙式的通用网格","不使用终端/浏览器/编辑器等界面外壳","不用发光网格或粒子替代结构"],"compositionFingerprint":"decision-fork-map:vertical-branch-tree-with-audience-lanes"},{"id":"balance-scale-verdict","name":"Balance Berat — 天平裁决盘","projectMetaphor":"一台对流行度进行称量的天平/校准台：每个工具是一个砝码，按社区投票的权重落在一根水平衡梁上的刻度位置，梁的偏斜即社区里的赞/疑偏向。比较不是罗列，而是肉眼可见的一次称量。","signatureVisual":"一条水平衡梁，上方悬浮写有流行度高度的工具刻度，下方斜出反映赞/疑偏向的倾斜量；梁的两端各是一个人群支点（创作者 vs 办公），编程工具则落在梁心。一条可读的偏斜连线，即裁决。","heroGeometry":"横向——一条贯穿版面的水平衡梁线，刻度自左至右对应流行度值；梁下一条斜线连接两端人群支点；支点用圆点、衡量用细支杆。整条视觉占满首屏宽度。","sectionSequence":["hero_paralysis（选择困难：问题即失衡，先定义病）","population_roster（46+ 候选工具的全员清点：谁在盘上）","weighing_mechanism（称量机制：流行度评分如何落地为刻度）","pricing_scale（定价放在同一根秤上：价值刻度）","sentiment_leaning（社区反应的赞成/质疑偏向线）","verdict_cadence（每日重新称量的日结时间戳）"],"surfaceModel":"仪器面板式表面：以深色面板为底、光线为测量读数的强调，刻度线、支杆与读数标签构成表面；章节之间用仪器分隔线而非圆角卡片。依赖明亮读数标志视觉。","palette":"深碳色仪器面板为底、暖琥珀为读数强调、冷石灰为中和衡梁；三种人群各自带一种识别色；警示与确定性用高对比色区分。","typography":"标题用工程感的粗无衬线并带刻度感的大数字排版；正文使用高可读中性字体；评分与刻度用等宽字体强调测量语言。","desktopComposition":"桌面为横向仪器叙事：首屏一条全宽衡梁贯穿，梁上刻度与读数标签同屏；后续章节以仪器分隔条纵向展开，最终收在日结读数上。全宽对比依赖衡梁完成。","mobileTransformation":"横向衡梁在 390px 无法平铺，转为主读数单值聚焦：先给一条被裁短的衡梁+当前读数，其余刻度折叠为竖向列表，支点与偏向线变为单列内的斜向指示。同一台秤的不同读法，而非简单堆叠。","mediaStrategy":"无本地素材（assetManifest 为空），不伪造截图；衡梁刻度和读数排版成为唯一标志视觉与数据载体。","forbiddenPatterns":["不做营销 Hero + 三指标卡开场","不做通用功能卡片墙","不用任何界面外壳","不用装饰渐变或辉光替代结构"],"compositionFingerprint":"balance-scale-verdict:horizontal-calibration-beam-with-leaning-verdict"},{"id":"radial-signal-bands","name":"Radial Signal Bands — 同心信号圈","projectMetaphor":"一张以人群为同心环的定位雷达：圆心是你（决策者），向外一圈是办公带、一圈是创作带、一圈是编程带；每个工具按其流行度信号强度落在对应环的某个方位与亮度上。选工具=在同心图里找到你环里最亮而不偏的位置。","signatureVisual":"一组同心圆环，每环表示一种人群带；工具以普通亮点/刻度符落在对应环上，亮度映射流行度评分，偏角用方位角示意；圆心处一个高亮『你』与最亮工具之间画一条连线。可读的信号定位，不是装饰光源。","heroGeometry":"圆环——以版心为圆心的一组同心圆（2–3 环），环上分布工具感应点；圆心定位决策者，最亮点连线到圆心；整组圆环居中占据首屏上部。","sectionSequence":["hero_question（问号即定位：你站在哪一环）","band_mapping（三环人群带：身份→所在环的映射）","radial_signals（环上工具信号：流行度即亮点的分布）","radar_pricing（定价作为一种信号方位角）","reactivity（社区反应的偏角波动）","freshness_tick（每日重新采样的信号时间戳）"],"surfaceModel":"天文/信号面板式表面：深空夜蓝为底、圆环与感应点为表，背景克制而清晰；章节以同心圆环切环节奏展开，依赖圆与箭头的结构语言，而非圆角卡片堆叠。","palette":"夜蓝底色为表、亮白或冷荧为工具感应点、三种人群各用一环识别色；圆心『你』用最亮高光；中性灰表现信号背景与刻度。","typography":"标题用略带未来的几何无衬线并在版心交错摆放，呼应圆形布局；正文用克制中性文字；评分用等宽数字体现信号强度读数。","desktopComposition":"桌面首屏为居中的同心圆信号图，圆心'你'与最亮工具连线；下方按环节奏逐段展开人群带、信号分布与定价角度，末尾以每日采样时间戳收束。圆形对比立于版心完成。","mobileTransformation":"同心圆在 390px 不易读，改为单环聚焦：一次只展开一圈（一条人群带），其余环折叠成环形指示器；工具信号点转为可横向滑动的环带；圆心与连线简化为界面上方的单个高亮传感点。同一精度，另一读法。","mediaStrategy":"无本地素材（assetManifest 为空），不使用截图或占位框；同心信号结构与读数排版承担标志视觉与数据承载。","forbiddenPatterns":["不做口号+三指标卡开场","不做可塞进任何项目的功能卡片墙","不用浏览器/终端/仪表盘外壳","不用发光网格或粒子混淆真实数据结构"],"compositionFingerprint":"radial-signal-bands:concentric-audience-rings-with-luminous-tool-signals"}],"selectedDirectionId":"decision-fork-map","selectionRationale":"三个方向都源自『比较/推荐』机制且刻意互异，但 decision-fork-map 最能表达本项目的真实运作：先用身份把用户分类进不同人群（Vibe Coder/创作者/办公），再在各分类内按流行度排序工具——这正是 material.json 中每次更新都要重做的一次归路决策。其分叉树结构使『分类→排序→对比』在首屏即可被结构本身读懂，不需任何营销海报；balance-scale-verdict 的横向天平擅长表达单一权重的称量但会把三种人群需求压平，radial-signal-bands 同心圈善于表达『你在哪』却弱于每次重排后的顺序对比。证据匹配上：分叉的三条支路直接对应 bestFor/摘要中的三类受众，车道排序对应流行度评分，横贯定价雷达与日结时间戳对应『每日自动更新』的两大主张。无本地素材时该方向的标志视觉完全由分类与排序数据结构承载，零占位框，与 antiTemplateContext（当前为空）无冲突。"},"designBrief":{"schemaVersion":"dodot-design-brief-v1","selectedDirectionId":"decision-fork-map","projectMetaphor":"一条把『我是谁』分叉成工具归属的路线图：先按身份（Vibe Coder / 创作者 / 办公）分叉，再在每个分叉里按流行度权重排出一列车道。工具选择不再是一个口号，而是一次显式的归路决策。","signatureVisual":"一个倒置的分叉树（粗主干向下分裂为三条斜向支路，每条支路再稀释成一列横向工具车道）；走向车道的枝段按流行度值增亮，被选中推荐的工具枝端醒目标识为亮色终点。这是分类结构，不是营销配图。","compositionFingerprint":"decision-fork-map:vertical-branch-tree-with-audience-lanes","heroGeometry":"纵向——左侧一条粗主干，向右下方分裂出三条斜支路，每条支路末端接一条横向工具道（3 条水平车道）；车道与车道之间留白以形成分支节奏，选中车道用实底强调。","sectionSequence":["hero_fork_intro（我是谁决定选谁：先别挑，先归路）","branch_audiences（三条分叉=三种人群，身份→类别的映射）","weighted_lanes（每条分叉内的车道：按流行度排序的工具队列）","pricing_radar（横穿分叉的定价雷达，作为另一维校验）","sentiment_axis（社区反应对比线：赞成/质疑的偏向）","daily_cadence（每日自动重排：分叉与车道每天刷新一次）"],"surfaceModel":"纸张式分区：背景为暖中性纸色，章节以清晰的分类卡片而非圆角浮层堆叠；支路与车道作为贯穿版面的平面连接结构，选区使用低对比毛玻璃质感，依赖结构而非阴影分层。","palette":"以纸白为底、墨色文字打底；三条分叉分别以三种识别色（编程青 / 创作杏橙 / 办公绛红）标记，选中车道用高饱和强调色；次层用中性灰阶表达流行度刻度。","typography":"标题用较宽字重的无衬线并配合粗斜的主干隐喻（可用字重与缩进制造分叉感）；正文使用克制的中性无衬线，数字与评分使用等宽字体表刻度。","desktopComposition":"桌面为纵向分叉树叙事：左侧主干区固定身份入口，向右上/右上收拢出三列并排的车道，车道上方悬定价雷达轴，底部以一条连续结构线收回到每日重排说明。横贯对比在全宽内完成。","mobileTransformation":"桌面三列车道在 390px 折叠为单一横向滑动游标（一次只能聚焦一个分叉），分支以竖向折线表现而非横向散开；定价雷达降级为可横向滑动的刻度条。同一概念，不同排布的决策，而非单纯竖排。","mediaStrategy":"无合格本地素材（assetManifest 为空），因此不设媒体区、不伪造产品截图；标志视觉完全由分叉数据结构和文本驱动的排版承担。","evidencePlan":["用 primary 分支的三条支路承载阅读过的最佳适用人群（Vibe Coder / 创作者 / 办公人员），对应 material.json summary.bestFor 与描述中的三类受众。","车道内工具排序展示流行度评分（摘要示例值，如 ChatGPT 97、Claude Code 92、Cursor 90），并用相对刻度而非绝对数值呈现。","pricing_radar / sentiment_axis 章节呈现『定价雷达与社区反应对比』主张，对应 highlights 中的定价对比与社区对比两项能力。","daily_cadence 章节体现『每日自动更新、覆盖 46+ 工具』主张，并负责任地标注评分基于社区信号而非官方数据，避免过度断言。"],"localeContract":{"zh-CN":"首屏短标语『AI 工具选择困难症的解药』；章节标题与描述以中文自然组织，分叉/车道/刻度用中文标签，正文密度符合中文阅读节奏。","en":"First screen short tagline 'The cure for AI tool choice paralysis'; sections use the same decision fork structure with natural English copy, fork/lane/ticker labels in English, pacing and density tuned for English readability. Chinese and English share the identical section sequence and brief."},"forbiddenPatterns":["不做大口号加三张指标卡的开场","不做可被任意项目填充的功能卡片墙","不使用浏览器/终端/编辑器/仪表盘界面外壳","不用发光网格或粒子替代真实的分叉/排序数据结构","不在无素材时伪造产品截图或占位媒体框"]},"visualReview":{"schemaVersion":"dodot-automated-design-review-v1","status":"approved","summary":"页面源码忠实实现了 design-brief 选定的 decision-fork-map 分叉结构：首屏以倒置分叉树把人群分叉为三支路，按 branch-audiences、weighted-lanes、pricing-radar、sentiment-axis、daily-cadence 依次展开，顺序与 brief 一致。事实均有 material.json 依据，且以相对刻度与 caveat 标注负责任制过度断言。双语章节结构、数字与文案等价且自然。未回退到 Hero+三指标卡/卡片墙/界面外壳/装饰渐变等禁止模式，无假控件。移动端媒体查询已将三列车道折叠为单一横向滚动吸附游标（scroll-snap 一次聚焦一个分叉）、首屏分叉树改为竖向折线步骤条、定价雷达降级为可横滑刻度条，intended brief 的局部重构，而非单纯竖排。七项检查全部通过，无 blocking issue。","checks":{"projectFit":{"passed":true,"evidence":"页面严格采用 decision-fork-map（compositionFingerprint vertical-branch-tree-with-audience-lanes）：header.hero 承载分叉树 intro，随后 branch-audiences、weighted-lanes、pricing-radar、sentiment-axis、daily-cadence 五节顺序与 brief.sectionSequence 一一对应（QA sectionCount=5 因首屏用 header 承载）。三条分叉映射 Vibe Coder/创作者/办公三类受众，车道按流行度排序，与 projectMetaphor 的归路决策一致。"},"evidenceBound":{"passed":true,"evidence":"关键数字均有 material.json 依据：46+ 工具、'32 个 AI 工具、14 个官方网站、每日 05:00 KST'（summary claim 2）、流行度示例 ChatGPT 97 / Claude Code 92 / Cursor 90（summary claim 4）、tykimos 仓库与 GitHub 链接（projection.repository）。车道工具名、评分、定价柱高与社区反应百分比作为示意值呈现：页面明确标注'示例信号值仅供参考''相对刻度''示例榜单''示意定价刻度''社区信号，非官方数据'，daily-cadence 与 caveat 声明'评分基于社区信号非官方''README 被截断'，未把示意数据当真实事实断言。"},"signatureVisual":{"passed":true,"evidence":"首屏 forkpipe 内是可读的分叉树 SVG：粗主干（stroke-width:16）向下分裂为三条斜支路（teal/apricot/crimson stroke-width:7），每条末端接一条横向工具车道虚线，并以 marker 箭头标注被推荐工具终点，下方 tree-labels 用色点+车道名对应说明。属于分类数据结构，非装饰配图，亦非终端/浏览器外壳。若干重复坐标路径为无害冗余，不影响结构可读性。"},"mobileTransformation":{"passed":true,"evidence":"max-width:980px 媒体查询实现了 brief.mobileTransformation 要求的局部重构而非单纯竖排：.lanes 改为 flex-direction:row + overflow-x:auto + scroll-snap-type:x mandatory，.lane flex:0 0 86% 使三列车道折叠为一次聚焦一个分叉的横向滑动游标；.forkpipe svg 在移动端 display:none，改用 .tree-fold 竖向折线步骤条（fold-branch 依 16/32/48px 递进内缩形成竖向折线）；.rzero 改为 overflow-x:auto + scroll-snap + .axis min-width:560px，将定价雷达降级为可横向滑动的刻度条。与同一概念不同排布、反对单纯竖排的要求一致。"},"localeParity":{"passed":true,"evidence":"zh-CN 与 en 共享完全一致的章节序列、分叉/车道/刻度结构与 brief 语义。zh-CN 文案中文自然流畅、密度贴合中文阅读；en 为地道英文（slogan'The cure for AI tool choice paralysis'），fork/lane/tick 标签各自本地化，数字与锚点信息（46+、32、14、05:00 KST、97/92/90/95/88/82）逐项等价，无信息缺失或错位。"},"antiTemplate":{"passed":true,"evidence":"未回退到禁止模式：首屏非'大口号+三张指标卡'（hero-meta 三个 chip 为小型元信息标签，非带大数字的指标卡）；分叉与车道为承载分类/排序的结构性数据，非任意项目可填的卡片墙；无 browser/terminal/editor 界面外壳与无依据设备壳；无发光网格或粒子替代结构；assetManifest 为空故未设媒体区、未伪造截图或占位媒体框，标志视觉由分叉数据排布承载。"},"noFakeUi":{"passed":true,"evidence":"未发现假控件：车道 .tool、pricing 柱、sentiment .vote 均为静态数据可视化 div，无 button/href='#'/onclick/input 等伪可交互元素，评分与刻度为静态文本，SVG marker/箭头为纯标注；唯一外部链接是真实 GitHub 仓库地址。QA 报告 fakeControlCount=0、brokenImageCount=0、missingAltCount=0、consoleErrors 为空。分叉树 SVG 中个别重复坐标的冗余线段为无害死代码，不构成假控件。"}},"issues":[]},"repairEvidence":[{"attempt":1,"before":{"qaPassed":true,"designReviewApproved":false,"qaEvidence":{"zh-CN":[{"viewport":"desktop","passed":true,"localePassed":true,"metrics":{"language":"zh-CN","h1Count":1,"h2Count":5,"sectionCount":5,"textLength":2019,"cjkCount":1157,"latinLetterCount":390,"scrollWidth":1280,"clientWidth":1280,"scrollHeight":6085,"h1Top":228.1875,"bottomInset":187.015625,"brokenImageCount":0,"missingAltCount":0,"fakeControlCount":0,"emptyLinkCount":0},"screenshotHashes":{"top":"a92bea258e33e368e7353bdc9973884194c0079fea593c1516cce9c78882d9dc","middle":"5e9c50250e073cdecc16998a37b6106c7a859f89a1afbb54ddacb213f5ba311f","bottom":"7a250ba2b6b09de4c40160105934ad1ee2b25e06bb5614f8697f72200108e7c0"},"consoleErrors":[],"networkRequests":[]},{"viewport":"mobile","passed":true,"localePassed":true,"metrics":{"language":"zh-CN","h1Count":1,"h2Count":5,"sectionCount":5,"textLength":2019,"cjkCount":1157,"latinLetterCount":390,"scrollWidth":390,"clientWidth":390,"scrollHeight":7187,"h1Top":250.28125,"bottomInset":233.953125,"brokenImageCount":0,"missingAltCount":0,"fakeControlCount":0,"emptyLinkCount":0},"screenshotHashes":{"top":"cf6803beb24a92c45e5c6b6b25261a8953029bf6852ea83301e9631a191a264b","middle":"4d68715cb158e8b9cd2e8a75c05fffa88f5c86161ef65f78b4ebc4733895a377","bottom":"976c40f392bd10bca458f3b94f7ab206c778d20ab93f45dcae2286608caa94af"},"consoleErrors":[],"networkRequests":[]}],"en":[{"viewport":"desktop","passed":true,"localePassed":true,"metrics":{"language":"en","h1Count":1,"h2Count":5,"sectionCount":5,"textLength":4613,"cjkCount":0,"latinLetterCount":3602,"scrollWidth":1280,"clientWidth":1280,"scrollHeight":5917,"h1Top":228.1875,"bottomInset":187.015625,"brokenImageCount":0,"missingAltCount":0,"fakeControlCount":0,"emptyLinkCount":0},"screenshotHashes":{"top":"8c9aac8e4d0f2a9f156b3b85110d4e31d52f9be041ff622ba78f78af457bbac4","middle":"14409cdec344e6a6d8d0a1787d7800801da90d19fb32d2302589ea73f88b5b1a","bottom":"466ff0323c590e78a35e03d334482dba067aa907a999d4abb6452181b746905a"},"consoleErrors":[],"networkRequests":[]},{"viewport":"mobile","passed":true,"localePassed":true,"metrics":{"language":"en","h1Count":1,"h2Count":5,"sectionCount":5,"textLength":4613,"cjkCount":0,"latinLetterCount":3602,"scrollWidth":390,"clientWidth":390,"scrollHeight":7978,"h1Top":272.375,"bottomInset":276.421875,"brokenImageCount":0,"missingAltCount":0,"fakeControlCount":0,"emptyLinkCount":0},"screenshotHashes":{"top":"c345261602434ff509287a5ed3e642eb08f5d52716a40589d286935107bbb4e0","middle":"52230266184fce08a64c699dd3e6a1a42eaad7d751e8bb42a6bcfabc3eef8454","bottom":"25bc750fd891869f4da84cb3c4b08f1f18a93895b89a5139eb2cbf4225bd9398"},"consoleErrors":[],"networkRequests":[]}]},"visualReview":{"schemaVersion":"dodot-automated-design-review-v1","status":"revise","summary":"页面专注实现了 design-brief 指定的 decision-fork-map 分叉结构：首屏以倒置分叉树将人群分叉为 Vibe Coder/创作者/办公三条车道，后续按 branch-audiences、weighted-lanes、pricing-radar、sentiment-axis、daily-cadence 依次展开，顺序与 brief 完全一致。事实均有 material.json 支持（46+ 工具、32 工具扫描、14 官方站点、05:00 KST 每日更新、社区信号评分、tykimos 仓库），且以相对刻度与 caveat 负责任制过度断言，双语章节语义等价自然。未回退到 Hero+三指标卡/功能卡片墙/界面外壳/装饰渐变等禁止模式，无假控件。缺陷在移动端：brief 明确要求桌面三列车道在 390px 折叠为单一横向滑动游标（一次聚焦一分叉）、定价雷达降级为可横向滑动刻度条，明确反对‘单纯竖排’；而页面仅在 max-width 媒体查询中把三列改单列堆叠（grid-template-columns:1fr），未实现任何横向滑动/滚动吸附结构，分叉 SVG 也仍按横摆缩放而未转为竖向折线。故 mobileTransformation 未通过，判 revise。","checks":{"projectFit":{"passed":true,"evidence":"页面严格采用 design-brief 选定的 decision-fork-map（compositionFingerprint vertical-branch-tree-with-audience-lanes）：首屏 header.hero 为分叉树 intro，随后 branch-audiences、weighted-lanes、pricing-radar、sentiment-axis、daily-cadence 五节顺序与 brief.sectionSequence 一一对应（QA 的 sectionCount=5，因 hero 用 header 承载）。三条分叉对应 Vibe Coder/创作者/办公三类受众，车道按流行度排序，与 projectMetaphor 的分叉归路决策一致。"},"evidenceBound":{"passed":true,"evidence":"页面关键数字均有 material.json 依据：46+ 工具（summary claim 与 bestFor/covers 46+）、'32 个 AI 工具、14 个官方网站、每日 05:00 KST'（summary claim 2）、流行度示例 ChatGPT 97 / Claude Code 92 / Cursor 90（summary claim 4，作为相对刻度呈现并标注'示列信号值仅供参考'）、tykimos 仓库与 GitHub 链接（projection.repository）。daily-cadence 与 caveat 明确声明'评分基于社区信号，非官方数据''README 部分内容被截断'，未夸大。"},"signatureVisual":{"passed":true,"evidence":"首屏 forkstage 内含真正可读的分叉树 SVG：一条粗主干（M120,28…stroke-width:16）向下分裂为三条斜支路（teal/apricot/crimson 三色 stroke-width:7），每条支路末端接一条横向工具车道线（dashed），并对'被选中推荐的工具'用 marker 箭头标注终点。下部 tree-labels 用三个色点（编程/创作/办公）+ mono 车道名在下方对应说明，属于分类数据结构，非装饰配图，也非终端/浏览器外壳。"},"mobileTransformation":{"passed":false,"evidence":"design-brief.mobileTransformation 明确要求三列车道在 390px 折叠为单一横向滑动游标（一次聚焦一个分叉）、分支改为竖向折线、定价雷达降级为可横向滑动的刻度条，并强调'同一概念，不同排布的决策，而非单纯竖排'。实际 @media(max-width:980px/520px) 仅把 .branches、.lane、.radar-row、.cadence 的 grid 改为 grid-template-columns:1fr 单列堆叠，分叉 SVG 仍原样横摆缩放；全文件无 overflow-x:auto / scroll-snap / 依轴滑动结构，未实现任何横向滑动聚焦或刻度条降级，属于 brief 明确反对的单纯竖排。"},"localeParity":{"passed":true,"evidence":"zh-CN 与 en 共享完全一致的章节序列、分叉/车道/刻度结构与 brief（六段式，5 个 section + 首屏 header）。zh-CN 文案中文自然流畅且密度符合中文阅读，en 文案为地道英文（slogan 'The cure for AI tool choice paralysis'），fork/lane/ticker 标签各自本地化，数字与锚点信息等价，无信息缺失或错位。"},"antiTemplate":{"passed":true,"evidence":"未回退到禁止模式：首屏非'大口号+三张指标卡'（hero-meta 的三个 chip 为小型元信息标签，非带大数字的指标卡）；车道与分叉为承载排序/分类的结构性数据，而非任意项目可填的功能卡片墙；无 browser/terminal/editor 界面外壳；无发光网格或粒子替代结构；无无依据设备壳；分叉树为数据结构驱动的 SVG 排版。"},"noFakeUi":{"passed":true,"evidence":"未见假控件：车道 .tool、pricing bar、sentiment .vote 均为静态数据可视化 div，无